Humans and gettocrats trully suck leave us alone after all we don`t hurt animals or people. They need to wakeup and smell the rubber room we now all live in. This is acceptable but this is forbidden for 10,000 years we killed people for doing it,a double standard. :thinking:

"The dog was squealing and crying, according to charging papers."

If so, my sympathy doesn't go out to him. I won't judge him yet though as I suppose the only evidence of abuse so far is the wife saying so.

My question is... "How many people do you know that are either always talking on a cell phone, or have it next to them at all times like a pacifier? Was she always talking on the phone during sex?" But it DOES sound hinky to be doing it on the porch while she is home.

He wont have my sympathy either if it was so.
They say it was a pitbull, I think it takes something before they squeal or cry.
What really happened will hardly be revealed, becayuse the animal control people will find evidence for animal abuse wether it is there or not.

do not pit bulls have teath? kidding

Wire you are right we will never know what happened
It has issues from the start there are other motovating things to this one.
Nothing happens with out a reason
What realy happened will be lost with the "reasons" to favor one side or other.

Cell phones are common I some times cary two [to lines] the digital cameras are free with them these days.
Good thing to remember for us all.

This will get worse befor it gets better that is a given
Rus

I'm going to guess the squealing and crying was more something the wife made up to make things worse. Just imagine how pissed off she was to find her husband having an affair, and that he choose the dog over her.

i am sure she knew about it for a while and either wants a divorce settlement of her chosing or the dog was not the only thing he was having on the side..sounds like a complete set up to me...wife leaves - says i will back in two hours waits for it to develop and bingo...bummer dude.

totally agree. We'll probably never know if the dog was actually in pain, or if it was just some BS made up to make the guy look worse in court.

What a BEATCH! We will probably never know exactly what happened between the man and his wife and the dog but it stands to reason that there was something else going on there. I agree with the other posters that she probably knew all along that he was having sex with his dog; hell, she may have even joined in at times. Then something goes wrong (they have a fight, whatever), yada, yada, yada and she takes her pictures to the police. All the more reason not to trust anyone... :cool2:

ive read an opinion about this somewhere, and it might not be such a great thing if zoophilla was accepted like the gays/lesbins, just think about it. parents not wanting to get pets for fear of their kids becoming zoo. and other stuff like that........only time will tell thow.......a few hundred years ago people where killed for having sex in any position other than missionary..........and theres always a chance socity will fall and we go into another dark age.




just my two cents

this painfully reminds me of something that happened to me quite awhile ago my second wife and i were playing with our fantasies while having sex one nite andconffessed to her that as aboy i had sex with female dogs and that my fantasy was to see a women having sex with a dog this seemed to turn her on .sometime later someone dumped a huge dog at our place we lived in the country he loked like a dane and lab cross he was with us for a couple of days when i came home from work she told me she played with the dog and she thought he would f--k her as he had mount her clothed so one night she asked me if i would like to watch of course i said yes so we played with the dog a few times she want take pictures so i bought a polaroid and we took some pics then she wanted some of the dog mounting me ok i thought little did i know i was being setup we took pics and i trusted her to keep them then she got a guilty consceince moral values etc.so we stopped i told her destroy the pics well she did all except the ones of mewhich she later showwed to people,because we were always fighting we have been divorced for over 20 yrs i still live in the same town i just never let it bother me my face was obscured in the pics .you got to be careful who you share your fantasies with

Go not wory
The people just spay neuter everything they get there hands on

But i have to agree with the people saying that there is something wrong with this story. Because really, i know my boyfriend dosent approve of it after i told him, so knowing that he dosent approve i wouldnt do it knowing he was home. but it dosent say whether or not the wife was home or came home, it just said she caught him. But also the thing about the back porch and the dog crying, It depends if the guy had neighbors or what kind of fence he had wouldnt somebody see? wouldnt some body here the dog? The only reason they put this new bestiality law was because of an incedednt with a man who died after having sex with a horse. when i read the article, apperently i guess the horse stomped him to death. I dont see any cruelty in hurting the dog. dogs have sex with eachother. not only that. dogs have bigger penises as well as the knot than some of us human men. so really its no big deal. WE are loving our animals. But its sad though that he will be the first to be tried

A Guy Died after having sex with a horse?
Did the horse kick him?
Did he have a heart attack from to much pleasure?
Why did they make the law if nothing BAD happened till AFTER they were done?
Do they figure the horse quitely resented the sex untill the guy stopped THEN killed him?
If the horse had anything to do with the man dieing at all....

You are so right Skylark. I read that and thought several things weird. Why would he do it on the back porch unless he thought it safe (ie: he trusted his wife). And how would she get cell phone photos. Cell phones have a very wide field of view with poor resolution, so she would have to be very close to show much. More over, they typically have a long shutter time. In short, they are terrible for taking such pictures from hiding.

There was an equally puzzling and darker story recently:

http://ga0.org/indefenseofanimals/notice-d...tter_id=4302076

It is the story of an old blind mare who was stolen, roped up, "raped" and thrown from a bridge. The obvious question was how would they know it had been raped? DNA testing takes weeks and the story came out immediately saying it had been raped. Either it was sexually mutilated or someone is stretching to make that claim. In any event, the torch bearing Christian fundamentalists love to make all zoos look like this kind of person and a true zoo is on the opposite end of the spectrum! In truth, I have found the religious fundamentalists are far less animal friendly than us. They hate zoophilia because it puts the animal on the same plain as us (or at least blurs the line of animal-man distinction) and that means you have to deal with all the other inequities (like eating them).

OZ