Article link: http://www.wzzm13.com/news/watercooler/wat...x?storyid=50703

It is sad that the sheep, in this case was injured. Just what we need, another person giving the ones of us who love our animals a bad name. :(

P.S. if this is in the wrong forum I apologize.

I think it should be in the zoo category - but glad you posted it here - that way when I move it a link in general will still draw attention to the thread...

this is an important post -we may never find out if he harmed this sheep accidentally or out of recklessness - but I would think he was being quite reckless in that he was caught - wether you favor fence hopping or not - this is what can happen when you dont take ever single precaution to guard your privacy... and this is what will happen if you get caught...

members no what your doing -and where you are doing it - a busted nut is not worth the consequences - be careful!

What a moron. Doesn't he know that if you want to mate with an animal, you should remember two things:

#1. Do it in a place where you know you won't have an audience.

#2. If you're gonna screw an animal, SCREW YOUR OWN! :badwords:


Thank you. ^_^

"This act is so representative of someone who is sexually perverted"

I tkink this is not an acceptable idea.... This man should not
impose us his view of what sexality should be !

There is not ONE good sexuality but a wide variety of sexualities ! :angry:

i dunno, what really irks me about the article is that the assume if he will screw a sheep, he'll screw children.

how the HELL do you make THAT connection? Is there some sort of study to back that premise up? Id like to see it if there is.

why not have everyone who engages is BDSM file for the sex offender list?

I, too, am bothered by how readily people lump EVERYONE who has sex with animals in the same category as child molesors. I think it's partially due to the fact that they are so ignorant to anything that is different to the norm that if they see it as perverted then it automatically must be wrong and therefore harmful, and children would be the next step in their minds.



If anything they're the perverted ones for thinking that.

Two things here, 1: I'm going to venture a guess here,, but the injury claim, made have been made, just to give the general public, a worse impression, of the events. Remember, they are going to make the situation look as bad as they can, to get as much negative hostiles, towards us, as they can muster up. It's part of the agenda, to continue to show us, as the "bad guys". 2: They connect us to other heinous crimes, again, to get the ignorant public to believe, that who we are, is wrong and evil. They have used that same ploy, against the gay community, many a time, yet, there is NO evidence, to support it. Cow_Poke

that actually, could be entirely true CowPoke.

Chances are he got caught in the act, and I would say the guy made up the part about the sheep being injured. I mean who makes the connection between finding a sheep bleeding from where he/she shouldnt be (who looks besides zoos) and a random guy they found on thier property? Not many unless you know yourself.

oh and in response to horseybuttsdrivemenuts :lol: is the apparent repulsion and attraction to sexually based crimes towards minors.

personally, the show Law and Order SVU creeps me out. Mostley it has to do with underage children being victims of violent sexual crimes. Its a very disturbing topic, but
"juicy" to a surprising amoutn of people (look at the ratings!) and does very well. Personally, I feel dirty to watch it, and i dont know who could possibly stomach it. I think in a way, society has a very perverted attraction to those sorts of things. Thats why its so frustrating when they call us degenerates, for doing something that is consentual and natural at the same time, meanwhile watching uncles violate thier nieces on television and deriving entertainment value out of it.

Isn't that a teeny bit hypocritical? <_< They call us nuts, but their screwing their family members, and nobody cares. Well, don't that just beat all?! :badwords:

Well thank God I do not live in Battle Creek...They seem just about as intolerant as the Koo Klux Clan.

But I do disagree with animal exploitation though.

i think you have to take into consideration the man's pattern of behavior. getting caught having sex with a sheep is the latest in a long list of crimes, all of which involve complete disregard for other people's property.

there was a B&E listed and what looked like a reference to either uttering threats or slander (written and spoken), all of which are signs of someone who is primarily concerned with his own interests, placing them before others.

Just because many people at BeastForum are kind and considerate people doesn't mean that all people who choose to engage in bestiality are the same way. Lots of people engage in sex, but they don't all do it for the right reasons.

that said... now anyone else who gets caught will get a heavier penalty, especially in the city/country/state where this crime took place.

Yes, but what I think is causing the outrage you're seeing here is the fact that both the prosecutor and the judge are lumping this man in with child molesters simply because he had sex with a sheep. No one is saying he's a good guy. But should he be classified as a sex offender? No. There is nothing in his prior criminal history that suggests he should.

Yes in this case he is a three time looser. When you go fence hopping you always take a big risk of getting caught. The report said the the sheep was injured? how and where was it injured are my first thoughts. As he was charged with sodomy, was it a lamb or a fully grown sheep male or female? No one has the right to injure and animal just to get their rocks off. As for the judge I think that without any proof to the contary he has let his feelings and private thoughts show in his statment that the man is to be place on the sexual perdator list as he might attack children. Also is the prosecutor and other council officals up for re election and putting on a good show for people. Did, he injure the sheep, or is it just all hype for the press. It is a good storie that sell news papers or gets people to watch the news. Yes I agree with that statment that once there is a precedence then it is writen in stone and used by every zelot to crucify anybody that does not conform to their narrow way of thinking. ie If you were gay, zoo, bondage or into free love you are a deviate of the lowest order. In olden times the indervidual was a dunked, place in the stocks, and or tortured until they confessed that they were possed by the devil. Their punishment varied from burned at the stake, garrotted or being hanged after watching the animal suffer the same fate. But now we are civilized we take the person to court, publish the expanded hyperthectal facts even before the trial. The victim has no rights in the eyes of the free press. ITheir reputaion is ruined their standing in the comunnity is always subject to what was implyed in the press.