I think i could do that in some circumstances, but not frequently.

no, never, it would be too ackward

I don't think I could, sorry. It's one thing to loan a friend your favorite shirt or let them borrow your car...but passing around your four-legged lover? I'll pass.

i would share but trust would have to be established first

I seem to be in the minority here but I voted yes though only under certain circumstances. It was only through an offer from a former flat mate that I got into this life and though I have no shortage of love and adoration for my animal partners I do find it much more exciting when there is another human involved. I wouldn't open the doors to anyone though. Those that have been with my girl have been people that I had known for some time and trusted. Only then would an offer be extended and this has happened a number of times and the experiences have always been really enjoyable. Ideally speaking I would be in a relationship with another guy and we would together have one dog but that ideal circumstance will have to wait for the future.

I do share my stallions with close friends. I can't satisfy their needs all the time and both of them (the people and the stallions) enjoy it. There are only a few who qualify for this so don't everyone ask lol. Besides, trained stallions are hard to find!

If you asked me this question two months ago the answer would be 'hell no'

Now my view has changed a little. Don't get me wrong, the answer is still 'hell no' in most cases. There isn't a person in the world I'd share Nikki with right now. But what I've come to understand, and accept...is dogs don't look at sex the way humans do. I recently played with a Dalmatian sexually that wasn't mine, in front of my dog. The dalmatian didn't care I didn't own her, she enjoyed it anyway. Nikki didn't care I was with another dog, wasn't mad I was 'cheating' What makes it fine, in my mind, is that I've been with this dalmatian for hundreds if not thousands of hours by now. Enjoying her as a dog before I fooled around with her. I care for her deeply, physically and emotionally. Nobody got hurt, everybody walked away happy. How is that wrong?

If I ever meet somebody who I care for, be it a friend or something more...and they love my dog. They truly care about her and after logging hundreds if not thousands of hours with her...and Nikki loves them and is open to the idea..why not? Who is it hurting? Say for instance I have a boyfriend, or simply a very good friend, who I live with or who sees me and my dog multiple times a week. If he loves my dog, and she loves him...and was every bit as comfortable with him as with me..who does it hurt? She'll love me no less afterwords, and I view it as her cheating on me no more than she'd view me being with another human as cheating on her.

So...'Hell no! Unless...'

Well no, why would you want to?
Are we talking about zoo love or lust here?

Also its law to have written documents for a reason.
Without written consent how do you know 'they' want it?

several of my zoo friends had their first k9 experiences with my dogs, and pretty all of us girls who still hang out together have had sex with each others dogs--share and share alike!

You hit on a good point there. I think that distinction ultmately comes down to the old beastlist vs. zoophile distinction. One enjoys the sex for sex the later enjoys the sex for love. Both are zoosexauls just different types. I would anticipate that the majority of beastlists would share all i fnot most of the time while zoophiles would be very selective in thier sharing.

I would share under the right cirmstances. I think i'm in the middle of the two classes. I have had zoo relations for both lust and love.

Anyways, I have shared my wife with other wemon, as she has shared me with them (always with her close bi hehe :lol: ). I would share my dog with my wife or one of her g/fs if the mood and intrest was right.

:thinking: Hmmmm I wonder what that would be like... :w00t: oops, got to go clean up :blush: