I think, that i am a true zoo. In the beggining i refused to have sex with mares, altough the urge inside and the growing love was very strong. And then i've lost control. But ofcourse nowadays i'm not only having sex with my lovers. But i never force a mare to have sex with me. It's absulutely her choice, and not someone else's. And anyway, i love and respect all horses. And there is the point, where i have to think a little... I'm NOT a true zoo! In my eyes most animals are inferior. I'm only respect horses. So i'm not a trues zoophile, but true EQUIphile.

Svad my friend he's beautiful :)
Hopefully within the next few months i can allow myself to get my horses once again (told myself after having to sell the last one that i wouldnt get another till i owned the land) Will keep ya posted if all goes well.

Guns :)

I find most animals superior, even my BF though I must say that he can't behave as bad as he does at times. I won't allow any situation get dangerous, which has happened slightly a few times lately, but could be that he feels it's spring time cumming close. Though admitedly Equines are the true owners of my heart and soul.

Guns my friend, thank you, he's a true sweetheart. he's so cuddly and cute. When I go up to his stall, he puts his head out and wants a cuddle, then pulls his head in and turns his sexy buns to me, and if I am in there with him, he will back over me, to get me to scritch and rub his sheath and shaft. That's my master for ya ;)
Beast of luck buddy :)

im definately true. sometimes i find holding my animals just as good as the sexx.

You and me both. Good to hear that.

This is a strange question. I do feel that I could love one animal to the exclusion of all others. BUT I also support animal experiments under the "NO other option/NO undue pain" heading. I also could just "have sex" with an animal just as I do with a human. No brutality but no real emotion either, sorta like a one night stand.

Anyway "thats my two cents".

Hmm, well i understand your point very good... But thats something i could never do, not even with a human. I dont like the idea just to (pardon me) srew a dog or human only for pleasure and satisfaction. To me the emotion behind the sexual act is a very very importand and powerfull part. Without it couldnt imaging to enjoy it completly, there would always be a part missing...

But maybe thats just me... ;)

This post has been edited by Honeyraptor on Mar 12 2004, 04:42 AM

It is a strange question, simply because the assumption of and definition of "True zoo" is rather ambiguos and bound only by individual opinion.

I don't feel exclusivity or one deep emotional attachment to be what defines a "zoophilic" label on others I meet online. (and we all label each other, honestly) Rather, what tells me "This person IS a zoophile" is a level of respect for and concern for his/ her animal partners. A person who looks out for the safety, health and security of their animal partners, shows concern for other animals, doesn't put self gratification above the needs AND desires of the animals they come in contact with....that to me is a "true" zoo, wether having one or many or no sexual partners, wether in a deeply emotional or just a "friendship" type relationship. Thats what matters IMO.

I dont think I have ever been a member

of a site where so many deep, profound articulate people reside...... what an

honor it is to be in such good company....


I know this is off topic but I just cant help saying stuff like that after reading

something that leaves me feeling so moved.


Wendy

You never know if you are a true zoo untill you find true love.
To find true love is finding yourself in another form shape and size, what keeps you binded to love is you it self, even if your love is not true to you.

I feel the same way Wendy. I am honoured to reside here among such fine people.

Very, Very well said Spirit.

Me, definatly a true zoo!
bestialitist are the ones who should be stuck in jail not us Zoos!

[SIZE=1]I hate to be the one with the screwed up ideas :unsure:

The problem i see with this is who would have to judge whos a true zoo and whos a beastialist?!? You? Me?

If you put one in charge to make the decisions he also gets the power to decide whos a zoo and whos a beasty! And from there its only a step till he can decide if your good and be permited to stay free or you're bad and have to be put in jail...

Power allways corrupts!! Even the best and bravest! :ph34r:

In the time ive spent in the "zoo community" i've seen too many different variations of "zoo's" to even consider the question of who's right, and who's wrong, in that way it's similiar to religion, everyone in one way or another believes thier way is the right way, and nothing is going to change that.

Some believe your not truely a "Zoo" unless your animal exclusive, others unless your "married" to your animal of choice. See, thats why i refuse to apply any lable to myself other than "Me", cos thats exactly what i am....myself and damn proud of it.

Guns :)