I've never seen anybody discussing it in real life, only in online forums. When speaking of entire conversations, they're not always negative. Some of them are neutral, which is about as good as anyone can hope for.

Even though most people hold negative opinions toward bestiality, there are usually at least a few neutrals who will step in to argue against them. They won't necessarily argue in favor of it, but will use common sense when disputing the ridiculous claims made by the extremists.

The people with the harshest opinions usually leave after a short time since their arguments lack any real substance. They commonly engage in group-think mentality, feeding off similar opinions to boost their egos. As a result, they tend to lose their will to argue when they are singled out with nobody around to back them up. It's amusing to watch them disappear after someone gives them a proper intellectual beat-down.

A discussion may start out with a severely negative slant, but will eventually quiet down into neutral territory if given enough time.

This post has been edited by ZetterGRD on Dec 17 2008, 07:39 AM

Hmmm, neutral would be a major improvement over the few conversations I have heard regarding zoo. It gives me some hope though :)

No :crying: