Forum Rules The Posting Rules - Last Update September 9th, 2007
Pages: (11) « First ... 8 9 [10] 11  ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Combination. Perversion., zoophilia e....
 
in Europe. it tends to combine often zoofilia with [CENSOR]. someone has this perversion?
1- yes [ 168 ]  [48.84%]
2- not [ 175 ]  [50.87%]
Total Votes: 343
Guests cannot vote 
Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
wet_lesbo_lover
Posted on Jun 29 2009, 07:39 AM
Quote Post


Enthusiast
***

Group: Members
Posts: 127
Member No.: 754346
Joined: 26-August 08


Rate Member:

yes, I am active in both fetishes
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
lovesuckingcock
Posted on Jun 29 2009, 08:29 AM
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Member No.: 890172
Joined: 25-June 09


Rate Member:

Yes I am into both aswell.
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 6 2009, 12:58 PM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

QUOTE (wet_lesbo_lover @ Jun 29 2009, 07:39 AM)
yes, I am active in both fetishes

:blush: :blush: :blush:

love

:blush:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 6 2009, 12:59 PM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

QUOTE (lovesuckingcock @ Jun 29 2009, 08:29 AM)
Yes I am into both aswell.

:wub: :blush:

how to get started?

:inlove:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 10 2009, 01:07 PM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

:heart:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 13 2009, 03:28 PM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

;)

promemoria...

13/07/09

1- yes [ 145 ] [48.49%]
2- not [ 153 ] [51.17%]
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
dr Kaninov
Posted on Jul 14 2009, 01:58 AM
Quote Post


Hardcore
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 505
Member No.: 106551
Joined: 4-May 05


Rate Member:

you can be attracted to one, or both, and to way too many other fetishes, but I seriously doubt there is a relation.

Probably the alleged connection stems from stereotyping people, such as the redneck jokes, where they either screw their sisters or the dairy cow...

Probably it is true that zoophiles have another fetish (I rode somewhere that bisexuality was far more frequent in zoos than in "normals", but the author also said that probably it meant that accepting such a behavior made it easier to accept a secondary behavior like bisexuality or vice-versa), but then it would be not a cause-effect thing like "this is a sports car because it is red", but a thing like "the car is red and a sport's car".
PMEmail Poster
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 14 2009, 10:46 AM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

QUOTE (dr Kaninov @ Jul 14 2009, 01:58 AM)
you can be attracted to one, or both, and to way too many other fetishes, but I seriously doubt there is a relation.

Probably the alleged connection stems from stereotyping people, such as the redneck jokes, where they either screw their sisters or the dairy cow...

Probably it is true that zoophiles have another fetish (I rode somewhere that bisexuality was far more frequent in zoos than in "normals", but the author also said that probably it meant that accepting such a behavior made it easier to accept a secondary behavior like bisexuality or vice-versa), but then it would be not a cause-effect thing like "this is a sports car because it is red", but a thing like "the car is red and a sport's car".

:inlove:

in this thread, that is 50%,
and is a test. the responses of members of b.f.

then there may be a link


:heart: :heart:

tnx 4 all post

:heart:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 16 2009, 04:05 PM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

:heart:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 21 2009, 11:02 AM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

:inlove:

BUMP

:inlove:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
deadforgood
Posted on Jul 21 2009, 08:32 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 10
Member No.: 803694
Joined: 25-November 08


Rate Member:

Yes, there's connection between zoophilia and іnсеst, and also adultery, cuckolding, pеdоphіlіa, bdsm and all the other sick shіt. Moral fall is fall in everything. That's when the men don't control his sex urges, but urges control the men. And that's pretty pathetic.
PMEmail Poster
Top
dudesdog
Posted on Jul 22 2009, 04:55 AM
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Member No.: 898408
Joined: 15-July 09


Rate Member:

ive had sex with dogs an my long time gf 'never together lol damn' any way never been attracted to a relative . Now her relatives mmmm
PMEmail Poster
Top
roboto
Posted on Jul 30 2009, 10:46 AM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

:blush:
bump
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
sluttysapphire69
Posted on Aug 1 2009, 03:54 AM
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 890423
Joined: 26-June 09


Rate Member:

QUOTE (cstek @ Apr 28 2008, 08:18 AM)
Many people who dont have odd sexual tastes (i.e. the "normal" people) have a tendency to throw everyone who has any sexual preference into the same pool.

If you're into beast, you MUST be into [CENSOR]. If you're into [CENSOR], you MUST be homosexual.

It's a matter of ignorance. They view all of these practices as filthy, taboo, indecent, etc. and therefor think that anyone who does one of these must do all of them, because they're just a 'bad' person for liking the things they like.

I highly doubt many of the people who are into one thing are also into another, especially the two you're talking about. There are always exceptions, but you cant really say an entire group of people does one thing just because they do another. Not all animal lovers are family lovers, and neither are they all homosexual.

This is what we call generalization. You're grouping together things that dont need to be, or warrant being, grouped together. Apples and oranges. It's an approach taken by people who are too ignorant to see the truth - that every individual is just that, individual, and you cant treat anyone as part of a group because we're not all clones of one another.

Sorry for the rant, but I feel pretty strongly on the subject, I dont like being criticized when I dont warrant it, and i'm sure nobody else here does either.

SPOT ON!!!

one of the best contributions i have seen yet!

i agree and it sucks that the majority of the population generalize. i have friends who often get harrased at work and outside because they are gay and the misinformed population assume that they're into things their not. it really gets to them sometimes even to the point where they try to be straight.

if i could vote a 10 from me!
PM
Top
roboto
Posted on Aug 1 2009, 10:07 AM
Quote Post


Veteran
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1592
Member No.: 154133
Joined: 29-August 05


Rate Member:

QUOTE (sluttysapphire69 @ Aug 1 2009, 03:54 AM)
QUOTE (cstek @ Apr 28 2008, 08:18 AM)
Many people who dont have odd sexual tastes (i.e. the "normal" people) have a tendency to throw everyone who has any sexual preference into the same pool.

If you're into beast, you MUST be into [CENSOR].  If you're into [CENSOR], you MUST be homosexual.

It's a matter of ignorance.  They view all of these practices as filthy, taboo, indecent, etc. and therefor think that anyone who does one of these must do all of them, because they're just a 'bad' person for liking the things they like.

I highly doubt many of the people who are into one thing are also into another, especially the two you're talking about.  There are always exceptions, but you cant really say an entire group of people does one thing just because they do another.  Not all animal lovers are family lovers, and neither are they all homosexual.

This is what we call generalization.  You're grouping together things that dont need to be, or warrant being, grouped together.  Apples and oranges.  It's an approach taken by people who are too ignorant to see the truth - that every individual is just that, individual, and you cant treat anyone as part of a group because we're not all clones of one another.

Sorry for the rant, but I feel pretty strongly on the subject, I dont like being criticized when I dont warrant it, and i'm sure nobody else here does either.

SPOT ON!!!

one of the best contributions i have seen yet!

i agree and it sucks that the majority of the population generalize. i have friends who often get harrased at work and outside because they are gay and the misinformed population assume that they're into things their not. it really gets to them sometimes even to the point where they try to be straight.

if i could vote a 10 from me!

:inlove:

ok ...

My survey says ...

nearly 50% love i.ncest

:inlove:
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteIntegrity Messenger IMMSN
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Zoophilia | Next Newest »

Topic OptionsPages: (11) « First ... 8 9 [10] 11  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 

            One of the largest message boards on the web !


[ Script Execution time: 0.3788 ]   [ 11 queries used ]   [ GZIP Disabled ]

Bestiality Links

Powered by Invision Power Board(U) © 2003  IPS, Inc.