I find it strange when I see furry or anthro porn, yet some people that are into it say they don't like beastiality? For example a drawing of a 'anthro' fox, it has very similar features to a real fox, even the penis is canine shaped....if you find that picture sexy then don't you find real foxes sexy? it just seems a little hypocritical, anyone agree or am I wrong here :blink:

Hypocritical it may be, but nevertheless many furries seem to hold a great contempt for anything on the side of beastiality. Some go as far as to violently object to any mention of zoosexuality. There may be several reasons, but of course it varies from person to person. The real life behavior of animal sex may just be too taboo for many to deal with, so they think that since they only look at drawings it makes it less objectionable. Many furries may be closet zoos (not all of them, of course). But then many probably are into both things at once, but prefer to keep it on the down-low.

furries tend to be more zoo than non-furry people. I'm a furry myself. In fact, not a lot of furries are so violent anti-zoo. A survey on a famous furry porn site suggest that a fourth of furries are zoo or have zooish fantasies. Majority of other three quarters are not hostile to zoo, but just not in it.

Well, just like there are different levels, or as an ass and ogre might argue... Layers..

There are different depths of the water that some people are more comfortable in.
The idea of BEING a furr(y) but still maintain some level of humanity.. is probably more attractive than full on Fido loving.

I was introduced to it, and well I wouldn't object nearly as much as I had.. if any Fido in the future thought it might be fun and I knew where he'd been and that he was safe. But others.. might really not think of their pets that way.. or farm animals... or parents.. or siblings.. whips.. chains.. pain... latex.. suffocation... whatever other deviated sex practices that used to be closeted away. It's all a matter of how deep they are comfortable moving into the realms of "Beyond sex for reproduction" in a very wide generic sense.

Preferably, I like keeping them separated. It lets me know who is into Fido, and who is into pretending to be part Fido.

I'm furr(y).. there is a level of pretending to be sexual while furred that is a turn on. Imagine, if you were covered in a short layer of fur, most things that brushed against you would be alot softer than it is with skin.. and where you have skin, and not that layer of fur... say around your most sensitive parts... *eg*

Maybe you get where Im going with that... Besides.. I grew up seeing anthro characters on the TV so there is a level (layer) of security(they are safe, won't hurt us) and familiarity there perhaps. I know I'll never BE one... but I'm certainly going to play one online! Yah, Sexy Anthro drawings are sexy, some are more beast and some are more human in nature.. Just depends on what the artist puts out and what you look for and save for future oogling.

And I don't feel comfortable playing a beast lover online, but real life, well.. it's possible.. and I never knew a dog's tongue could be so powerful. :whistling:

So, I don't believe that they are hypocritical at all. I don't think being a Beastialist (is that a word?) and being Anthro or attracted to Anthro... or Furr(y) is the same thing at all. They are two very real and very different levels of sexuality.

Beastiality, if you sit and think about it... is in my opinion a very base pure animalistic lust that you hit it with everything you've got as fast as possible, as though your very life depended on it... is a big part of it. Powerful desires? hehe It's not supposed to happen, it's naughty.. it's down in the dirt with the pigs (haha) nitty gritty sex.

And as I have come to understand here in this forum.. there are differences between zoo and Beast... Zoo's are generally all about the love they get from the animal as a companion. Sex may or may not actually be involved.. and if it is... you get to be with your lover/companion/life partner/best friend.. in yet another way..

I never considered the adoration of an animal to be the basis of a complete relationship.. but once I started reading in the Zoo forum... it's come to my attention that this is for some people the only way to live.. as humans are simply not an option they are willing to entertain.

Okay, I'm done. :) It isn't weird.. and it isn't any more hypocrite than a zoo saying they don't like beastiality.

Hope this post wasn't over the top..

This post has been edited by Anubisgirl on Nov 23 2007, 11:43 AM

Never been into fury's, and as to the drawing one See's, one can ask why do most of the furry animals show many human characteristics. Like human breasts on the female animal and human penis on the male animal of a size that would be more fitting on a horse or packerderm.

Well I am a long time fan on anthromorphics or otherwise known as a furfen. I don't think its so much of an instinctive "anti-furry" emotion going on with furfen; so much as a desire not to be burdened with all those not into furry or anthromorphics automatically seeing them as zoophiles just because they like to look at furry porn. In short its an attempt to distance themselves with a practice that is not necessarily connected to the furry fandom. Though I do agree it does seem that some fur fans go a little too far in the rabidness of their anti-zoo rhetoric.

Personally, I think most of them are just zoos in denial. But hey, sexuality isn't simple. I could see someone getting off on furries but not real animals.

This is a great thred
I will keep reading

R

I'm not a furries fan. However I think most furries don't actually want to have sex with an animal. They just really love an animal, say a horse or fox. However the fantasy is for the animal to have human characteristics. In their fantasy they're having sex with a woman or man who just happen to share the animals characteristics. In other words the furry character is a fully functioning and thinking person who just happens to look like a horse or a fox. :thinking:

I started out as a furry fan, but then I realized that I liked the way real animals smelled, in a sexual way, and it progressed from that point. Also, that furries are just a fantasy, but canines and equines are real. I can say that I would be more attracted to furries if they were real, since it is easier to become mentally intimate with human(oids) and it is nice to be with a being on the same level of intellect. As close as I can relate to dogs, it could never be the same. Not that I see my attraction to animals (instead of furries, which are not real) as settling ... I don't believe humans are superior to other animals, but each species is designed to communicate with its own kind, and a real life furry would be the 'best of both worlds', so to speak ! Just as long as a furry would not deny his or her animal heritage (something we humans mistakenly do).

I can understand how one may be attracted to furries but not real animals. However, when it comes to canine anatomy and what not, it becomes more and more curious. :whistling: As Silkythighs said, though, it could be more about the human 'sentience' (whatever that is !!) and intelligence with animal features. (Who wouldn't prefer fur to hairy, bare skin, or foot pads instead of shoes ?!)

This post has been edited by fuzzmart on Nov 24 2007, 11:17 AM

I like the both of them. I know of people who just like one of them, but you have to let them answer this question. I have always found both animals and furries hot and sexy.

I think there's a difference between fantasy and reality. For example, some have very radical SM fantasy, but he won't do this in reality. furries are people that fantasize about sex with animals, especially anthropomorphic animals. Only part of them will do it in the reality. And another major difference is: zoos have sex with animals, but still regard him/herself as a human; furries sometimes fantasize him/herself as a anthropomorphic animal. For me, I'm in the middle. I like to fantasize about anthropomorphic animal sex with non-morphic animal. :D

I think there's a difference between fantasy and reality. For example, some have very radical SM fantasy, but he won't do this in reality. furries are people that fantasize about sex with animals, especially anthropomorphic animals. Only part of them will do it in the reality. And another major difference is: zoos have sex with animals, but still regard him/herself as a human; furries sometimes fantasize him/herself as a anthropomorphic animal. For me, I'm in the middle. I like to fantasize about anthropomorphic animal sex with non-morphic animal. :D

Sorry because of some problems in my browser, I posted it twice. Sorry

This post has been edited by VulpesVulpes on Nov 24 2007, 03:20 PM

I think it depends..some furries are into zoo and some aren't. There also maybe some of them who have zooish feelings and don't confess it.

Yes, I like this thred. It is dealing about the fundamenthal question why are we as we are. I believe that there must be a readson for everything. In my case , I started only 3 years ago plus. At first I was very offended as I found my husbands hidden Hard Drive for our pc, full animal mivies and pics. I wasnted to confront him rightaway as soon he commes home from work. But there was so much on that HDD, that I could not see all in few hours, so I desided to go true the all HDD and see if is into something more that animals. But on the 3.rd day, I got turned on by watching all the animal movies, , and the day after, I was masturbating by watching the mivies as if there was no tomorrow. So the you have one example, We must have been exposed to some animal movies, to be converted and turned on. Yes at first we would be angry and horryfied. But now I'm in full love affaire with neighbours dog, and I would not miss a dog penis for the world. But, There is something I must say to all of you, as I have chated with many girls and married women. All girls, should keep some human relationships or they will grow Ferral ! For me, I'm a married woman and I love my husband despite I know what he is uptu,, and it turns me on that he does not know about my relationship with neighbours dog. That's my payback for keeping his secret from me for all the years., But there is still the fundamenthal question that is not answered here,, nor can I answer it. But I will put it thisway : We can have sex with a dog in two ways.... we can lover ourselfs to his level of existance, and imagine that we are bitches,,, Or we can try to lift the dogs ability to become as much human as possible. For instance, I would let my k9 lover mount me only frontaly (missionary) and after he is inside and we are tied, and he stops humping and only squirts,, I have trained him to lick be breasts and nipples, just as mu hubby would do.So I can see a difference between just being mated by a dog,, or making love to a dog. the latest I preffer. But we are not the same, some only like to score, or doing it for sport, or just becouse is so intime, and forbidden. Thanks heavens we are all differend. love, zennie